Student: ________________________________
TIE 532 - Project 2 Assessment Rubric - “Peripheral Purchase”
Course goals and expected
student learning outcomes. As part of this course, students will:
|
Research, evaluate, and strategically develop a plan for the configuration and budget for an instructional system, involving the modification of facilities, and acquisition of computer hardware, software, and related peripherals. (TS-2B, TS-2D, TS-7C, TS-7E, TF-VII.A.1, TF-VII.B.4, TF-VIII.D.7, TF-VII.B.2, TF-VII.B.7) (As appropriate) Assist teachers in the use of technology for classroom instruction, including the selection of resources for special needs populations, and safe and healthy use of technology. (TS-7G, TS-8B, TF-I.A.2, TF-VI.D.1)
|
|
Report
Objectives |
Indicator |
Exceeds |
Meets |
Approaches |
Not
Observed |
Points |
|
Provide a detailed description of your faculty’s needs for peripheral add-ons to support instruction.
|
Introductory remarks
|
In addition to the “meets” criteria for introductory remarks (at right), the report provides relevant details about the nature of the assignment, namely a description of work to be done in the school district, along with specific details involving the nature of the special grant, how the peripheral purchased will be used in instruction, as well as how faculty professional development activities will be planned and arranged. |
The report provides an overview paragraph, generally informing the reader about the school’s need for added instruction, along with an explanation of how a state supported grant supports the school’s planning efforts for equipment and training. |
The report refers to the school and identifies that it has for technology equipment and staff development needs. |
An introduction is not provided. |
|
|
|
Needs Assessment
|
In addition to the “meets” criteria for needs assessment (at right) the report recites examples of the different populations to be served, and strategies that may be used to enhance learning. Reference is made to formalized assessments conducted by the school and included in the school’s Technology Plan. |
The report provides a heading along with one or more paragraphs which identify clearly why the new peripheral equipment is needed, and how faculty staff development needs were identified. |
The report alludes to a need for additional computer equipment and training from which the school might benefit. |
A needs assessment is not provided. |
|
|
Market Survey
|
In addition to the “meets” criteria for market survey (at right), the report also addresses any faculty professional development training opportunities that may or may not be included with the purchase.
|
The report provides an explanation of the method used in determining the desirability and availability of peripherals that are particularly useful for instruction. Selections identified are based on quality, reliability, warranty, and manufacturer support. |
The report provides a list of prices found in professional magazines, magazines of general circulation or websites; peripheral products are recommended for purchase on the basis of low cost. |
A discussion of market research is not provided. |
|
|
|
Identify teachers (i.e., by subject or grade) who will be receiving new peripherals. Also describe how the peripherals will be used, and how the teacher(s) will assess the effectiveness of the equipment when used to assist with classroom instruction. |
Narrative: Results and Conclusions
|
In addition to the “meets” criteria for narrative results and conclusions (at right), the report outlines a plan of action for the school, including specifics about the method of deployment of the peripheral(s), how instruction might be improved as a result of its/their use, as well as how specific types of faculty professional development activities might be used and included in the school’s plan for technology implementation. |
The report provides a concise, easy-to-read summary of how the peripheral(s) will be used and what teachers will use them. The report will include a synthesis of the needs assessment, market research undertaken, and total cost, along with the author’s informed opinion about the value of the proposed peripheral purchase. |
The report provides an itemized listing of costs associated with the adoption of this project. |
A narrative, along with the writer’s conclusions and recommendations is not evident. |
|
|
|
Final Recommendation(s) |
As part of the report’s final recommendations, a plan of action identifies target dates for purchase installation, and final checkout prior to its use for instruction, as well as a follow-up satisfaction survey. |
The report is summarized and recommendations are identified and related to targeted goals included in the school’s Technology Plan.
|
The report is summarized, but no recommendations are given. |
Final recommendations are not provided. |
|
|
Table(s)/Project Budget |
In addition to the “meets” criteria for table(s) /project budget (at right), the report employs an attractive format for displaying information in a formal report. |
The report contains a table in the narrative which itemizes and compares costs of different computer models. It also contains a project budget breakdown (either in the body of the report) or as an attachment. |
The report includes either a table of representative costs, or a budget attachment, but not both. |
Table(s) and/or Budget listings are not provided.. |
|
|
Observe style and writing guidelines. |
Spelling |
The report is free of spelling errors. |
The report contains no more than two spelling errors. |
Some spelling errors (up to three) are present in the report. |
The report is marred by excessive and egregious spelling errors. |
|
|
Grammar
|
The report is free of grammatical errors. |
The report contains no more than two minor grammatical errors. |
Some spelling errors (up to four) are present in the report. |
The report is marred by excessive and egregious grammatical errors. |
|
|
|
Report Mechanics
|
The report is consistent with the guidelines and free of mechanical errors. |
Te report contains no more than two minor mechanical errors. |
Some mechanical errors (up to four) are present in the report. |
The report did not follow style sheet recommendations in the guidelines. |
|
|
|
Exceeds |
Meets |
Approaches |
Not
Observed |
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|